BA 370 EMPLOYMENT LAW ALL CASE
Follow below link to get this tutorial:
Contact us at:
BA 370 EMPLOYMENT LAW ALL CASE
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow
other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes (Ch 1, p 17)
- Nino v. The Jewelry Exchange (Ch 1, p 22)
- Narayan v. EGL, Inc. (Ch 2, p 37)
- Solis v. Laurelbrook Sanitarium and School (Ch 2, p 42)
- Zheng v. Liberty Apparel Co. (Ch 2, p 51)
- Jones v. Oklahoma City Public Schools (Ch 3, p 77)
- Hasan v. Foley & Lardner, LLP (Ch 3, p 80)
- Collazo v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Manufacturing (Ch 3, p
89)
Case Analyses 2
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow
other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- EEOC v. Target Corp. (Ch 4, p 113)
- Harrison v. Benchmark Electronics Huntsville Ch 4, p
119)
- Stewart v. Jackson & Nash (Ch 4, p 123)
- D.D.N. v. FACE (Ch 4, p 136)
- Burghy v. Dayton Racquet Club (Ch 5, p. 147)
- Sigal Construction v. Stanbury (Ch 5, p. 153)
Case Analyses 3
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow
other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- Brownfield v. City of Yakima (Ch 6, p 176)
- EEOC v. Dial Corp. (Ch 6, p 185)
- Lanning v. SEPTA (Ch 6, p 191)
- Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections (Ch 7, p
204)
- Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America (Ch 7, p 213)
- Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority (Ch 7, p 220)
Case Analyses 4
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow
other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County
(Ch 8, p 242)
- Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 249)
- Dean v. City of Shreveport (Ch 8, p 251)
- EEOC v. Fairbrook Medical Clinic, P.A. (Ch 9, p 277)
- Hardage v. CBS (Ch 9, p 286)
- EEOC v. Xerxes Corp. (Ch 9, p 291)
Case Analyses 5
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow
other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- Horgan v. Simmons (Ch 10, p 313)
- EEOC v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Ch 10, p 322)
- Cloutier v. Costco (Ch 10, p 335)
- Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas (Ch 11, p 357)
- Bachelder v. America West Airlines (Ch 11, p 361)
- Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson
County (Ch 11, p 369)
Case Analyses 6
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow
other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- Chao v. Gotham Registry (Ch 12, p 395)
- Whalen v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 12, p 405)
- Vehar v. Cole National Group (Ch 12, p 415)
- Livick v. Gillette (Ch 13, p 430)
- Battoni v. IBEW Local Union No. 102 Employee Pension
Plan (Ch 13, p 435)
- DiFelice v. U.S. Airways (Ch 13, p 443)
- MasTec Advanced Technologies (Ch 14, p 466)
- United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 204 v.
NLRB (Ch 14, p 475)
- NLRB v. Whitesell Corp. (Ch 15, p 490)
Case Analyses 7
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow
other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC (Ch 15, p 510)
- Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (Ch 15, p 528)
- State Ex Re. Gross v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (Ch
15, p 533)
- Senske v. Sybase, Inc. (Ch 16, p 554)
- Cortez v. Walmart Stores (Ch 16, p 562)
- Hoffman v. Caterpillar (Ch 16, p 571)
- Hernandez v. Hillsides (Ch 17, p 591)
- Stengart v. Loving Care Agency (Ch 17, p 602)
- Dietz v. Finley Fine Jewelry (Ch 17, p 610)
Case Analyses 8
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from
different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case
questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages
total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when
referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other
prescribed guidelines for APA format.
- Dillon v. Champion Jogbra (Ch 18, p 632)
- Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services (Ch 18, p 639)
- Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 18, p 647)
- Descotiis v. Whittemore (Ch 18, p 662)
- Collins v. Gee West Seattle LLC (Ch 19, p 686)
- Wittenburg v. American Express (Ch 19, p 692)
- Proudfoot Consulting v. Gordon (Ch 19, p 708)
Course Project Overview
Develop a training program to help new
managers learn the fundamentals of employment law and their role in
implementing the policies and practices that maintain legal compliance in the
workplace. Components of the project are assigned in each module, contributing
to the comprehensive final product by the end of the course.
Training Objectives
Develop 5-7 training objectives for the program.
What should managers know and be able to do when they have completed the
training program?
Program Outline
Develop a 1-page outline of the content you
plan to include in the training program. What major topics and subtopics will
be covered? What are the most important things managers will need to know about
their role in employment law compliance? Include ideas about the kinds of
training methods best suited for delivering the content and achieving the
learning objectives.
- Informational methods: one-way communication to convey
important factual information (i.e. lectures and audiovisual media).
- Experiential methods: interactive methods to give
trainees opportunity to apply knowledge, practice skills, and demonstrate
behaviors (i.e. e-learning, simulations, case study analysis, and role
play).
Annotated Bibliography
Write an annotated bibliography to gather
descriptive information about the sources you will use to develop your training
program; use at least five credible, scholarly resources besides the text. Once
complete, the annotated bibliography will also serve as a reference list for
trainees, a takeaway new managers can use on the job when confronted with
employment law issues and the need to consult specific resources for further
information.
In addition to the bibliographical information
about the source that would typically appear in a works cited list, include a
concise paragraph or two to briefly summarize the content of the source and to
describe how it is relevant to the training or how it will be useful to
managers beyond the training.
Here is an example of an annotated
bibliography entry for the Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL):
Purdue OWL. “Annotated Bibliographies.” The
Purdue OWL. Purdue U Writing Lab, 08 Jan. 2010. Web. 10 March 2010.
This webpage from the Purdue Online Writing
Lab (OWL) defines how an annotated bibliography is different from a typical
works cited list, in that it includes additional descriptive information about
the sources in paragraph form. It further explains that the annotations, or
additional notes about a source, might serve one or more purposes: to summarize
the content of the source; to evaluate its usefulness, reliability, and
objectivity; and/or to reflect about its applicability to a particular argument
or research. Students who are asked to write an annotated bibliography will
find this information helpful because it clearly explains what an annotated
bibliography is, why it might be useful to write one, and how to do so
(including links to additional information on formatting in various writing
styles such as MLA and APA).
Training Content, Part 1
Expanding on the outline created in Module 2,
develop the content for the first half of the training program as it will be
presented to trainees. In the outline, you identified the most important things
managers will need to know about employment law. In this part of the project,
you will explain those things in greater detail so that new managers can better
understand their role in human resource practice and workplace compliance with
employment laws.
This component of the project will likely take
the form of a Power Point presentation, although other delivery methods may be
considered. Whatever medium is used, it should allow for a sufficient amount of
detail about each subtopic and key point. For example, the slides in a Power
Point presentation might contain concise bullet points, while elaboration of
those key points is provided in the “notes” section below each slide (in normal
view, but not visible in slideshow mode). Alternatively, audio recordings can
be added to the presentation so that trainees may view it in slideshow mode and
hear the trainer elaborate on the key points in each slide. Be sure to cite
sources and provide references for trainees to seek further information.
Training Content, Part 2
Develop the content for the second half of the
training program.
Case Study
Write a 2-page original case study in which
you present a scenario (related to some aspect of employment law) for trainees
to analyze. The scenario may be hypothetical, or based on actual events or
circumstances (so long as the names of individuals and companies are changed to
protect privacy and confidentiality). The case study should provide
sufficient background information and factual details so that trainees can
apply knowledge gained from the training as they analyze the scenario and
formulate solutions or recommendations. The written case study should include
4-5 questions to stimulate critical thinking and discussion about the scenario
and relevant concepts.
Trainee Assessment (Knowledge and Application
of Content)
Develop an instrument to measure the trainees’
understanding of and ability to apply specific concepts from the training. To
what extent are they able to do that which was identified in the training
objectives? This portion of the project may take the form of a traditional
paper/pencil “quiz” or a computer-based simulation, if students have sufficient
technology skills. Be sure to provide both questions and answers so that
trainees are able to self-evaluate their understanding of the concepts and
their degree of achievement of the training objectives.
Complete Training Program
Based on feedback from the instructor and
peers in previous modules, make revisions to various portions of the training
program as needed or appropriate. Compile the individual components into an
integrated whole, and submit the final project.
No comments:
Post a Comment